This question already has answers here:开发者_JAVA百科 Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: In Objective-C why should I check if self = [super init] is not nil?
I\'m trying to figure out the best way of writing a unit test for an overridden method which calls super() as the last step. Basically, I want to massage parameters before they\'re used in the base cl
Still a rails and ruby newbie, and I\'m trying to figure out why adding \'super\' fixed a problem I was having. (Was actually just a dumb guess to try \'super\' so I have zero understanding why it now
I am working on an application where i am pushing one view controller on to a UINavigationController and releasing it immediately as the navigation controller retains it.When i am poping the view cont
the idea is to to have multiple widgets on a page and include all js and css files needed form this \'widgets\' (it\'s easy to manage files this way). Duplicated files is not a problem.
class Foo a: -> x.call => super will not compile as I can\'t call super from anonymous class. However my
I made a small chunk of code because I\'m still trying to figure out the specifics of using sup开发者_StackOverflow中文版er(). Why does this chunk run to this TypeError?
With the following code: class ObjA def func puts \"ObjA\" end end module Mod def func puts \"Mod\" end end class ObjB < ObjA
Suppose I have the following static method and interface (List is java.util.List). Note that the static method enforces a \"super Foo\" on the wildcard type of the list.
I have an init method that is used and overridden through out an extensive heirarchy. Each init call however extends on the work that the previous did. So naturally, I would:
加载中,请稍侯......