I\'n new to ExecutorService, but am unsure about my approach to this. I could be dealing with up to 100 threads for a known task.
I have a singleThreadExecutor in order to execute the tasks I submit to it in serial order i.e. one task after another, no parallel execution.
I wrote many Async Future Task Calls one below another in my java program. Giving one sample below FutureTask<List<ConditionFact>> x = getConditionFacts(final Member member);
I\'m quite new to executer services. Liked doing everything myself, but I think 开发者_JS百科it\'s time to trust these services.
I have written a Bluetooth API for connecting with an external accessory. The way that the API is designed is that there are a bunch of blocking calls such as getTime, setTime, getVolume, setVolume, e
I want to cancel a FutureTask that I get from a ThreadPoolExecutor but I want to be sure that Callable on the thread pool has stopped its work.
Since use ExecutorService can submit a Callable task and return a Future, why need to use FutureTask to wrap Callable task and use the method execute? I feel they both do the same thi开发者_开发问答ng
In my Callable code I use signaling to notify multiple ending behaviours to another thread. The Callable objects are queued up with FutureTasks in an Executor. They may also be cancelled after being q
I have an application written in java that needs to find all the reachable hosts on the network. I use InetAddress.isReachable() to do this with a timeout of 2000 milliseconds.
I currently have code that does the following: private final static ExecutorService pool = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
加载中,请稍侯......