I understand that non-virtual methods are statically bound, which means, as far as I understand, that its known at compile-time itself as to which method will be invoked on which object. This decision
When designing an interface, som开发者_Go百科eone recommended to use the non-virtual interface pattern. Can someone briefly outline what the benefits of this pattern are?The essence of the non-virtual
are java final methods and c+开发者_如何学Go+ nonvirtual methods different or the same? How?They are different.
I have a hierarchy that looks something like this: class Base { pu开发者_JAVA百科blic: void Execute();
I came across the following code in a header file: class Engine { public: void SetState( int var, bool val );
What is the difference between NVI ( Non-Virtual Interface ) and the Template Method patterns? They seem very similar and I\'ve read both that they\'re basically the same and that they\'re subtly dif
In C++ an interface can be implemented by a class whose methods are pure virtual. Such a class could be part of a library to describe what methods an object should implement to be able to work with
In C++, I often needed NVI to get consistency in my APIs. I don\'t see it used as much among others in C#, 开发者_开发问答though. I wonder if that is because C#, as a language, offers features that ma
加载中,请稍侯......