For example: class Foo : boost::noncopyable { // ... }; class Bar开发者_开发百科 : public Foo { // ...
Adding any noncopyable member to a class would prevent the automatic generation of copy construction and assignment operator. Why does boost require inheritance to use noncopyable?
I have a small confusion regarding the situations where the implementation (compiler) will not supply the copy constructor and the copy assignment operator.
Just a question. Looking at C++ Boost libraries (in particular boost::thread class) I ended up thinking: \"how is it possible to create a class defining objects that cannot be copied but 开发者_如何学
Assuming I have: class A which is non-copyable class B which has as a member, const A& a (and takes an A in its constructer and sets it in its initialization list)
Im trying to make some text non-copyable, my aim isn\'t to stop people from copying text from my website but more to make it easier to use. I have a list of files with file size\'s but I want to only
开发者_StackOverflowSee title. Ihave: class Foo { private: Foo(); public: static Foo* create(); } What need I do from here to make Foo un-copyable?
加载中,请稍侯......