It would be nice if this code were invalid. But it\'s conceptually sound, and GCC accepts it although Comeau doesn\'t:
I\'m on a roll today. Here goes n00b question number 7: What\'s the difference between explicit specialization and just regular functions when you try to overload a template function?
How to write 开发者_JAVA技巧explicit specialization for object Car<T> in virtual method clear()?
If I compile the following code: // // g++ static.cpp -o static.o // ar rcs libstatic.a static.o // #include <iostream>
I have to use an external library, but am getting a \"multiple definition error\" from following template function and its explicit specialization, if it gets called with a std::string.
This was motivated by this article (page 开发者_JAVA百科5) template<class T> T const &f(T const &a, T const &b){
After asking this question and reading up a lot on templates, I am wondering whether the following setup for a class template makes sense.
Hi I\'m having problems selecting the correct version of a templated class which has an explicit specialization.I\'m wanting to select a specialization using a derived class of the class used to speci
加载中,请稍侯......