Is the Initialize-On-Demand idiom really necessary when implementing a thread safe singleton using static initialization, or would a simple static declaration of the instance suffice?
I\'ve got a situation that keeps cropping up in my system and I\'m looking for a good code/config pattern.I haven\'t come up with one that makes me happy yet.
I have my own attribute [Finder] for fields and p开发者_开发问答roperties, and I have a kind of factory that initializing all fields and properties as I want.
I\'d like to use Lazy T to implement memoization but the initialization function appears to require a static context.
I have a Userdetails class like the one below public class UserDetails { public string ssn; public string username;
static storage is decided at compilation time. However, consider the scenario where we have lot of lazy initialization in functions:
Currently I have a child entity that has a @ManyToOne association to it\'s parent entity. Previous developers have set this field as lazy=\"false\" to get the parent whenever needed when the session i
I\'ve been using LazyReference class for a few years (not on a regular basis of course, but sometimes it is very useful). The class can be seen here. Credits go to Robbie Vanbrabant (class author) and
Is it intentionally that a mis-coded lazy init: -(X*开发者_如何学JAVA) prop { if (!prop) { prop = [[Prop alloc] init];
I am in the beginning of my project. So I am trying to design an architecture which avoid Hibernate LazyInitializationExceptions. So far my applicationContext.xml has: