What I would like would be something like this: gem \'rack\', \'1.3.3\', \'1.2.4\' So that开发者_C百科 when gems require different versions of rack, they are all appeased.Is this possible?You can s
While creating creating an integration test via rails generate integration_test foo it declined with Could not find ffi-1.0.9 in any of the sources
I\'m working on a gem and have setup my Gemfile (Rails 3.0.9) to download the latest copy from github.After several updates, I now have a bunch of these different versions installed through bundler, f
If there are two gems, A and B. A1.0.0 depends on B1.0.0. In my Gemfile: gem \'A\', \'~> 1.0.0\' Then run bundle. It will generate a Gemfile.lock like:
I deployed my first rails app to a production server a few days ago.Since then, I\'ve been working on some fixes on my development machine and I pushed those over to the production server via git.I to
I had use jeweler to create a gem skeleton and wrote some come on it. Now ... ho开发者_运维知识库w can i put it in my gemfile?Simply use the \'path\' option:
I got the server with the configuration above. This is the important part of my deploy.rb recipe: $:.unshift(File.expand_path(\'./lib\', ENV[\'rvm_path\']))
I\'m working on a project that runs on Rails ~> 3.0 on the master branch, and ~> 3.1 on another branch.
I just installed a fresh version of Ruby 1.9.2 via RVM on Mac OSX 10.7. I\'ve activated 1.9.2 and my system seems to recognize ruby/gem/rails:
Note:I retagged this question since I neglected to include the Aptana tag.The error occurs when choosing \"run server\" in Aptana Studio 3.Aptana tries开发者_StackOverflow社区 to execute script/rails