UPDATE 2 Original question: Can I avoid using Ragel\'s |**| if I don\'t need backtracking? Updated answer: Yes, you can write a simple tokenizer with ()* if you don\'t need backtracking.
I\'m trying to write a scanner for my C/C++/C#/Java/D-like programming language that I\'m designing for personal reasons. For this task I\'m using Ragel to generate my scanner. I\'m having trouble und
%%{ machine microscript; action ClearNumber { currentNumber = 0; } action RecordDigit { uint8_t digit = (*p) - \'0\';
I\'ve been working on a parser for simple template language. I\'m using Ragel. The requirements are modest. I\'m trying to find [[tags]] that can be embedded anywhere in the input string.
I am trying to do a syntax text corrector for my compilers\' class. The idea is: I have some rules, which are inherent to the language (in my case, Portuguese), like \"A valid phrase is SUBJECT VERB A
打爱神 2022-03-20 20:57 开发者_如何学运维三星Neo QLED 8K电视的画质表现非常棒。它的Neo量子点8K处理器，可用16个神经网络实现AI驱动的8K画质，量子点矩阵技术Pro能够扩大亮度范围，带来更深邃的黑和纯粹的白
Everytime I try to create the following table in MySQL command line: CREATE TABLE book( `book_id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
ycgq1982 2022-04-04 12:20 开发者_如何学JAVA禁止抄袭，禁止胡扯！谢谢大家。
I want to parse a continuous stream of bytes (from a socket) with a state machine using Ragel However, all the Examples I have found are either parsing a complete file in one pass (like the Gherkin l
加载中,请稍侯......