I\'ve got the following test: @Test(expected = IllegalStateException.class) public void testKey() { int key = 1;
I often see catch clauses for Throwable in Blackberry documentation, such as the Network API docs. My sense is that this is not generally a good practice in Java.
Possible duplicate: why-is-java-lang-throwable-a-class Hi! I doesn\'t understand why Throwable isn\'t abstract class. I see only one use case for these: in logging systems for figure out call hierarc
Can any 开发者_StackOverflowof you explain what the differences are between throw, throws and Throwable and when to use which?
There are lot of posts on java.lang.Error saying it should not be caught. My question is if it should not be caugth the what is the use of it. Since it is Throwable so we can catch it in try catch. I
class Bouncy<T> extends Throwable { } // Error: the generic class Bouncy<T> may not subclass java.lang.Throwable
This question already has answers here: 开发者_JS百科 Why catch Exceptions in Java, when you can catch Throwables?
API doc says never catch Throwable subclass Error which signifies abnormal behavior. Does it implies that the segregation between Error and Exception is to tell programmers that which subclass should
I know throw new Exception(); has a pretty large overhead, since it creates a full stackTrace, etc. Does
I think Exception.fillInStackTrace should return Exception or derived Exception objects. Considering the two functions below,
加载中,请稍侯......