I find innodb quite annoying when I try to design a db structure, at least compared with MyIsam, which seems to have less limitations
I\'ve got a table that receives around 50 inserts per second. Right now there are 700k records, using 160 MiB. My little VPS with 1 gig of ram is keeping up, but just barely.
I need to do full text indexing for two different colums in two different tables. The only problem is that I\'m using innodb and there is no way for me to do full text indexing.
MyISAM allows very convenient way to create serials. E.g. In the table primary key is id+seq(-uence) id seq
This question is probably for MySQL experts and admins that have done this sort of migration before. I have 17 MySQL tables, triggers and stored procedures on MyISAM storage engine. These tables have
I have issues with using the MyISAM engine in my database. It is constantly corrupting and has severely varying query times. Thus I can not use it any more. I have found the InnoDB to be a good altern
I need to make a lot of UPDATE and I don\'t need to read the table often. So I thought of using UPDATE LOW_PRIORITY but does it return the correct number of affected_rows() ?
On a very limited environment (slow CPU, little RAM, but a lot of disk space), what would be the advantages of using different storage engine than MyISAM assuming an optim开发者_如何学Cized php script
I have a database that is about 20 GB in size. I want to know if there are any optimization tips specific to working with a database that is static.When I mean static, I don\'t mean changes infrequent
I\'m trying to optimize a simple sql query that will be run over a ton of data lot of times. This is the scenario:
加载中,请稍侯......