开发者_JAVA技巧 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references,or expertise, but this question will likely so
I\'m making a class that initializes instances of certain classes.This class will be used to initialize a few different types of classes all subclassed from a common super class.Currently I am using a
Is there any difference between those three declarations? var x; var y:Object; var z:*; Is there anything in AS that开发者_如何转开发\'s not an Object?var x; and var x:*; mean precisely the same th
I\'m used to dynamic typing meaning checking for type info of object/non o开发者_如何学编程bject oriented structure at runtime and throwing some sort of type error, ie if it quacks like a duck its a d
How often do you take advantage of dynamic typing in a way that really wouldn\'t be feasible in a statically typed languag开发者_如何学JAVAe?
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing
Friends, I must create a series of ArrayLists, each containing objects of unknown origin, with each instance assigned to a separate local variable.
If I have a class that holds one or several lists, is it better to allow other classes to fetch those list开发者_运维问答s (with a getter)? Or to implement a doXyzList/eachXyzList type method for that
As the title suggests, I\'m tyring to pass a variable data type to a template class. Something like this:
I\'m trying to define a class (or set of classes which implement the same interface) that will behave as a loosely typed object (like JavaScript). They can hold any sort of data and operations on them
加载中,请稍侯......