Given the following piece of code: final case class Attr[A](name: String)(implicit conv: String To A) {
Following my previous question came a quick and great answer, however it turned out my example didn\'t match my actual production code well enough. In summary I\'m in need of a new implementation of t
I\'ve been hearing a lot about different JVM languages, still in vaporware mode, that propose to implement reification somehow. I have this nagging half-remembered (or wholly imagined, don\'t know whi
I recently stumbled over this post, which \"introduces\" the collect method for Scala collections. The usage is straight forward:
I want to serialize a Map with Jackson. The Date should be serialized as a timestamp, like all my other dates.
Given the following hypothetical type hierarchy: BaseElement + StringElement + .... + .... + BooleanElement
i want to implement the following exhaustive match, but i can\'t figure out to remove the type parameter and thus the warning that it is erased:
Forgive me for asking such a question but I have been开发者_运维问答 doing C# for the past couple years until very recently so I am a little rusty on type erasure generics in Java compared to the intu
I was wondering if some form of type erasure exists for dealing with methods that have the sa开发者_JS百科me name and arguments but return different values like in my example below (begin and end).I\'
I have some code similar to this: public class A<E> { protected E value; public E getValue() { return value;
加载中,请稍侯......