Just wanted to check to make sure that I understand this.A synchronized method doesn\'开发者_Go百科t create a thread, right?It only makes sure that no other thread is invoking this method while one th
This piece of code: synchronized (mList) { if (mList.size() != 0) { in开发者_JAVA技巧t s = mList.size() - 1;
hi there i am working on threads and implement some simple examples with them. In additio开发者_如何学JAVAn, i know how to lock and use a synchronized statement but i saw an example like this;
I was playing with Disruptor framework and its port for .NET platform and found an interesting case. May be I completely miss something so I\'m looking for help from almighty Community.
Let\'s imagine someone synchronizes a method returning an int: int whatever = 33; ... public synchronized int getWathever() {
I see this code quite frequently in some OSS unit tests, but is it thread safe ? Is the while loop guaranteed to see the correct value of invoc ?
A warning is showing every time I synchronize on a non-final class field. Here is the code: public class X
What does it mean when we say an ArrayList is not synchronized? Does it mean that if we declare an ArrayList in object scope, multiple threads accessing the objects have the opportun开发者_运维技巧i
I had a problem with a thread locking up for some still unknown reason in my Android App whenever I tried to kill Thread B from 开发者_JAVA百科Thread A (usually, sometimes it worked).I guessed that it
I have a collection of objects that is modified by one thread and read by another (more specifically the EDT). I needed a solution that gave me fast look up and also fast indexing (by order inserted),
加载中,请稍侯......