looking at http://download.eclipse.org/jetty/stable-7/xref/com/acme/ChatServlet.html, I don\'t seem to understand why there needs to be a synchronization block in a synchronized method, like so:
Say I have something like this (and I do) class QueBean extends JPanel { private Queue queue = new LinkedBlockingQueue();
My colleague and I have a web application that uses Spring 3.0.0 and JPA (hibernate 3.5.0-Beta2) on Tomcat inside MyEclipse. One of the data structures is a tree. Just for fun, we tried stress-testing
I need to iterate through a bunch of dynamically generated fields, but this doesn\'t work: $population_density = $_POST[\'$current_location_id\'];
Are there any unclear side effects to throwing an exception from 开发者_如何学Pythonwithin a synchronized clause?
I have this problem: I have a few threads which access one object with synchronized(Object) { ... } But sometimes this exception is raised:
Given this code: public class Messager implements Runnable { public static void main(String[] args) { new Thread(new Messager(\"Wallace\")).start();
For some reason, the output of this: public void msgNeedParts() { // Blabla... System.out.println(name + \": Try to print \'tasks\'...\");
I\'m using s开发者_StackOverflowtatic ArrayList in a class to store information about non-updatable database fields. I\'m planing to initialize it in constructor once (init method call guarded by lock
In Java each object has a synchronisation monitor. So i guess the implementation is pretty condensed in term of memory usage and hopefully fast as we开发者_运维问答ll.
加载中,请稍侯......