I have a class that gives details about payment.The attributes are accountNo, transactionAmount, dateOfTransaction.
We are working with a number of unix based filesystems, all of which share a similar set of restrictions on that certain characters can\'t be used in the username fields. One of those restrictions is
I\'ve often heard that these methods (Object.hashCode and System.identityHashCode) return the address of the object, or something computed quickly from the address; but I\'m also pretty sure the garba
I have the following situation: I have many BSTs, and I want to merge isomorphic subtrees to save space.
In my application, I have model classes of the following form: class Book { private int ID; private String title;
I was looking through some of the .net source yesterday and saw several implementations of GetHashcode with something along the lines of this:
Equal Objects must have equal hashcodes. As per my understanding this statement is valid when we have intention of using object in hashbased datastuctures. This is one of contract for hashcode and equ
Implementing equals() and hashCode() for simple data POJOs is cluttering my code and maintaining is tedious.
I stumbled upon an article regarding the Birthday Paradox and it\'s implications when overriding the GetHashCode method, I find myself in a bind.
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: Why does Java's hashCode() in String use 31 as a multiplier?
加载中,请稍侯......