int i=0; try{ int j = 10/i; } catch(IOException e){} finally{ Console.WriteLine(\"In finally\"); Console.ReadLine();
This question already has answers here: Why use finally (9 answers) Closed 1 year ago. As far as I can tell, both of the following code snippets will serve the same purpose. Why have fina
I want to do something mildly silly. In my Dispose开发者_运维问答() method for an object, I want to print a debug trace for the object, telling me all events which happened while it was alive.
If I am using a try/catch/finally block where and how should I initialize variables? For example say I\'m trying to use a FileStream . I want to catch any exceptions thrown while creating or using the
Is it possible to determine if code is currently executing in the context of a finally handler as a result of an exception being thrown? I\'m rather fond of using the IDisposable pattern to implement
This question nags me for a while but I did not found complete answer to it yet (e.g. this one is for C# Initializing disposable resources outside or inside try/finally).
Consider开发者_运维百科 the following code where LockDevice() could possibly fail and throw an exception on ist own. What happens in C# if an exception is raised from within a finally block?
What exactly does a finally block in exception handling per开发者_JAVA百科form?It holds code that should always be executed, regardless of whether an exception occurs.
Given this code: String test() { try { return \"1\"; } finally { return \"2\"; } } Do the language specifications define the return value of a call to test()? In other words: Is it always the same
Is there a way, how to get currently thrown exception (if exists)? I would like reduce amount of code and apply some reuse for task looks like: