Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
I have read that Scala\'s type inference is not global so that is why people must place type annotations on the methods.(Would this be \"local\"开发者_StackOverflow type inference?)
I\'m curious which statically-typed languages have no generics support (and to a lesser extent which languages historically did 开发者_如何学编程not have generics), and how they deal with it.
I have read that with a statically typed language like Scala or Haskell there is no way to create or provide a Lisp apply function:
I have two classes public class A { public A() { } } public class B:A { public B() { }开发者_JAVA百科 } and it the code in Main is as follows
开发者_JAVA技巧 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references,or expertise, but this question will likely so
I\'ve an unexpected trouble calling put on an old-school hashtable. What\'s going on here? Welcome to Scala version 2.8.0.final (Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, Java 1.6.0_21).
Is a statically开发者_如何学运维-typed full Lisp variant possible? Does it even make sense for something like this to exist? I believe one of a Lisp language\'s virtues is the simplicity of its defini
I want to write code like this: /*something*/ Fn() { ... } int main() { /*something*/ fn = Fn; while(fn) fn = fn();
In my current job I\'m building a suite of Perl scripts that depend heavily on objects. (using Perl\'s bless() on a Hash to get as close to OO as possible)
加载中,请稍侯......