I am using ply and have noticed a strange discrepancy between the token re match stored in t.lex.lexmatch, as compared with an sre_pattern defined in the usual way with the re module.The group(x)\'s s
Is there grammar or lexer and parser for Python (or subse开发者_运维知识库t), written in PLY?I\'ve found it myself:
I\'m developing a BNF for chess algebraic notation and ran into an interesting case, input going to the wrong non-terminal.
I\'m using PLY to parse sentences like: \"CS 2310 or equivalent experience\" The desired output: [[(\"CS\", 2310)], [\"equivalent experience\"]]
I am using Python with PLY to parse LISP-like S-Expressions and when parsing a function call there can be zero or more arguments. How can I put this into the yacc code. This is my function s开发者_开发
I am writing a parser using ply that needs to identify FORTRAN string literals. These are quoted with single quotes with the escape 开发者_如何学Gocharacter being doubled single quotes. i.e.
你张阿姨2019开发者_开发百科 2022-06-22 14:49 我找了找我的WS插件，是 CodeGlance
I\'m using an older version of PLY that uses the md5 module (among others): import re, types, sys, cStringIO, md5, os.path
I\'ve been using PLY to build up a parser for my language, however I\'ve got a shift/reduce conflict that\'s causing me some trouble.My language has generic types with a syntax ala C++ templates.开发者
加载中,请稍侯......