This question already has answers here: Closed 10 years ago. Possible Duplicate: Is it possible to write a C++ template to check for a function's existence?
I\'ve recently started reading Modern C++ Design by Andrei Alexandrescu. After reading Compile-Time Assertions, I tried the following code:
I know that boost::variant uses boost::mpl stuff behind it and has a mpl-compatible typedef types. Let\'s say I have a simple typedef: typedef boost::variant<bool, int> Variant;
Is it possible to reliably determine the compilation time stamp of a given class for both java applications runnin开发者_JAVA技巧g locally and as applets and/or JNLP webapps ? According to the Java Vi
Before making a commit, I prefer to开发者_JS百科 run all hundred-something unit tests in my C# Solution, since they only take a couple minutes to run.However, if I\'ve already run them all, all is wel
what is considered best-practice in this case? for (i=0; i<array.length(); ++i) or for (i=array.length()-1; i>=0; --i)
I wanted to check that typeid is evaluated at compile time when used with a type name (ie typeid(int), typeid(std::string)...).
I want to set a custom error message via @Controller, there is something like Struts saveMessages(...) in spring?
Is it possible to obtain the name of the current procedure/function as a string, within a procedure/function? I suppose there would be some \"macro\" that is expanded at compile-time.
I don\'t think this is currently possible or if it\'s even a good idea, but it\'s something I was thinking about just now.I use MSTest for unit testing my C# project.In one of my tests, I do the follo
加载中,请稍侯......