How do I convert my argument to a proper type declaration. Ie. how do I go from type to T in the following
Greetings, A old colleague of mine made this code: public abstract class PagedViewModelBase<T> : PartnerViewModelBase, IPagedCollectionView where T : Entity, IEditableObject, new()
Can an anonymous class declare its own type param开发者_高级运维eters?You are right, it\'s not possible. Since an anonymous class is meant to be used only once, what would be the point of adding type
I am trying to create a Vector class that is generic for all numeric types. my original attempt was to write a class for all Types like this:
In Java, why can\'t an array be a Type Variable\'s bound, but can be a Wildcard\'s bound? You can have:
i would like to access, in a trait, the type-parameter of a type-parameter of that trait. without adding this \"second-order\" type-parameter as another \"first-order\" parameter to the trait. the fol
I\'m currently writing an expression parser. I\'ve done the lexical and syntactic analysis and now I\'m checking the types. I have the expression in a data structire like this (simplified version):
What I mean is this: scala> class Bounded[T <: String](val t: T) defined class Bounded scala> val b: Bounded[_] = new Bounded(\"some string\")
I have a typed pair class: class TypedPair[T] and I want to apply a certain function to a heterogeneous sequence of them:
F#\'s inline functions with statically resolved generic parameters seem to be similar to C++\'s templates. However, unlike C++, you need to specify the constraints - how does that work?