My BIRT report retrieves data using a SQL query (JDBC datasource). My SQL Server 2005 database is set to use snapshot transaction isolation.
Could some one please help me understand when to use SNAPSHOT isolati开发者_Go百科on level over READ COMMITTED SNAPSHOT in SQL Server?
I have a problem understanding read consistency in database (Oracle). Suppose I am manager of a bank . A customer has got a lock (which I don\'t know) and is doing some updating.Now after 开发者_运维
In plain English, what are the disadvantages and advantages of using SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
When measuring performance on my query I came up with a dependency between isolation level and elapsed time that was surprising to me
I\'m trying to get a handle on whether we have a problem in our application with database connections using incorrect IsolationLevels.Our application is a .Net 3.5 database app using SQL Server 2005.
Is it true that \"Every statement (select/insert/delete/update) has an isolation level regardless of transactions\"?
What are the risks or performance degradation when using SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ?
I\'m trying to execute a simple select query using IfxCommand. I would like to set isolation to dirty read, but I have only found examples of setting isolation level in the context of an IfxTransactio
While investigating a problem I believed to be related to lock escalation and thinking that READ_COMMITTED_SNAPSHOT would be the solution, I checked whether it was already enabled.To my surprise, the