In this question about including all the classes in a directory for an interpreter that needs all of them, it was suggested that a better way to handle the problem would be to conditionally include on
I\'m integrating doctrine with Zend Framework. I\'ve hit an error thrown from cli. It seems Zend_Application_Bootstrap_Bootstrap does not have a require_once for Zend_Application_Bootstrap_BootstrapAb
I\'m a php newbie (but long time developer in other languages) and I\'m trying some example db connections in \"PHP, MySQL, & JavaScript\". It shows an example file to include db connection variab
Is this just a stylistic difference, or does using 开发者_Python百科require_once(\'filename.php\') vs require_once \'filename.php\' have actual load/efficiency differences?Pear Coding Standards say :
I have this code in the __constructor $this->Reliability = new Reliability(\"name\",\"url\"); 开发者_StackOverflow
Debugging someone else\'s PHP code, I\'d like to selectively override one of their classes.The class is included via:
Today I\'ve tried to include file that returns object. I always use require_once, however now I\'ve noticed weird behavior of it.
I designed my code to put all important functions in a single PHP file that\'s now 1800 lines long. I call it in other PHP files--AJAX processors, for example--with a simple \"require_once(\"codeBank
Simple question: Is the scope of require_once global? For example: <?PHP require_once(\'baz.php\'); // do some stuff
I have a php file which has a require_once Statement (?)this file is then in included in 2 other php files, one php file is in a sub directory so the layout is like this (\"file1\" and \"file2\" inclu
加载中,请稍侯......