开发者_JAVA技巧This question already has answers here: Is floating point math broken? (31 answers)
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
I am trying to solve these problems with truth tables using the formulas below. I am having a problem with the NOT to NAND
When evaluating an expression in a scalar (boolean) context, Perl uses the explicit value 1 as a result if the expression evaluates to true and the empty string if the expression evaluates to false.
I am taking a digital logic class and i am trying to multiply this binary number. I am not sure what a carry in is and a carrry out. the teachers slides are horrbile. It appears he used a truth table
I am trying to simplify the following piece of boolean algebra so I can construct the circuit : A\'.B\'.C.D+A\'.B.C.D\'+A\'.B.C.D+A.B\'.C\'.D +A.B\'.C.D+A.B.C\'.D+A.B.C.D\' + A.B.C.D
I\'m trying to write a condition for a nested if statement, but haven\'t found a good example of using or in if statements.The following elsif condition fails and allows the code nested beneath it to
This is what I want: !A || (A && B && C)Is this equivalent t开发者_如何学Pythono the original? !A || A && B && C why or why not? Yes, they are the same. So is the simpl
What is the simplest way to do a three-way exclusive OR? In other words, I have three values, and I want a statement that evaluates to true IFF only one of the three values is true.
basically have two questions. 1. Is there a c++ library that would do full text bo开发者_运维百科olean search just like in mysql. E.g.,
加载中,请稍侯......