I\'ve been trying to solve this implicit equation by using fzero in MATLAB. File that holds the code is named as \"colebrook\" and I\'ve typed so far is as below.
In the Scala Collections framework, I think there are some behaviors that are counterintuitive when using map().
Here\'s another one for implicits and path dependent types. I don\'t understand why I need to be so verbose here: (Note -- I found the answer, see below)
I was playing around with the new Scala IDE (Eclipse 3.6.2 + Scala IDE 2.0.0 [Scala 2.9.0]) and I tried to do something simple like this:
As I understand from this blog p开发者_运维问答ost\"type classes\" in Scala is just a \"pattern\" implemented with traits and implicit adapters.
I wonder what is the reason for the (implicit ev: Null <:< A1) here: sealed abstract class Option[+A] extends Product with Serializable {
Instead of having to specify [DataMember] for every member, is there a sort of attribute that can just assume it is a datamember?
The following code generates a compile error in Xcode: template <typename T> struct Foo { Foo(T Value)
When constructor is explicit, it isn\'t used for implicit conversions. In the given snippet, constructor is marked as explicit. Then why in case foo obj1(10.25); it is working and in foo obj2=10.25; i
I\'m learning Ruby, but I\'m having trouble with the whole implicit return value thing.Someone please tell me why this returns an empty vector:
加载中,请稍侯......