From my readings, it seems that ScheduledExecutorService is the right way to start and stop timers in Java.
I am wondering if this is the best way to do this. I have about 500 threads that run indefinitely, but Thread.sleep for a minute when done one cycle of processing.
EDIT: This is basi开发者_StackOverflowcally a \"how to properly implement a data flow engine in Java\" question, and I feel this cannot be adequately answered in a single answer (it\'s like asking, \"
I have a question that is related to possible overhead of ExecutorServices in Java. The present implementation has ExecutorService A with a capacity of 5 threads.
Is there a way to catch global \"crashing\" app exceptions like objc_exception_throw, EXC_ARITHMETIC etc. in code? I need that because I want to do some things bef开发者_如何学Core the app gets killed
I\'m looking for an ExecutorService implementation that can be provided with a timeout. Tasks that are submitted to the ExecutorService are interrupted if they take longer than the timeout to run. Imp
Which Java synchronization construct is likely to provide the best performance for a concurrent, iterative processing scenario with a
My code snippet: ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(); try { Task t = new Task(response,inputToPass,pTypes,unit.getInstance(),methodName,unit.getUnitKey());
I have an Executors.newFixedThreadPool(1) that I send several different tasks to (all im开发者_Go百科plementing Runnable), and they get queued up and run sequentially correct? What is the best way to
I have the following Java code: final Future future = exeService.submit( new Runnable() { public void run() {
加载中,请稍侯......