I new to OOP, but with a \"procedural\" background. I\'m currently trying to get 开发者_开发问答my head around OOP via GNU Smalltalk and Lovejoy\'s\"Smalltalk: Getting The Message\".
I have been trying to understand python metaclasses, and so have been going through some sample code. As far as I understand it, a Python metaclass can be any callable. So, I can have my metaclass lik
I\'d like to mo开发者_StackOverflow中文版dify all classes in Python. For example str and int and others like Person(object).
I\'m working on a serialization tool using Moose to read and write a file that conforms to a nonstandard format.Right now, I determine how to load the next item based on the default values for the obj
In Python 3.1, there is a new builtin function I don\'t kno开发者_开发问答w in the builtins module:
EDIT: Note that this is a REALLY BAD idea to do in production code. This was just an interesting thing for me. Don\'t do this at home!
I\'ve always set up metaclasses something like this: class SomeMetaClass(type): def __new__(cls, name, bases, dict):
In the example enumeration code given in this question, reproduced below, why does TOKEN contain the implementations of __contains__ and __repr__ from the metaclass EnumerationType?
What are 开发者_运维技巧the main differences between Python metaclasses and class decorators? Is there something I can do with one but not with the other?Decorators are much, much simpler and more lim
At the top level, method definition should result in private methods on Object, and tests seem to bear this out: