I work on a project with a legacy service layer that returns null in many places if a requested record does not exist, or cannot be accessed due to the caller not being authorized. I am talking about
A few of my methods in Java throw exceptions such as NoSuchElementException, IllegalArgumentException, etc. But when using开发者_开发百科 these methods, these exceptions appear to be unchecked. In oth
Joshua Bloch in \"Effective Java\" said that Use checked exceptions for recoverable conditions and runtime
Is the开发者_JS百科re a possibility in Java to get rid of the necessity to catch non-RuntimeException exceptions? Maybe compiler flags?
I have an Exception chain in which method1 throws an Exception to method2 which throws the Exception on to main. For some reason, the compiler forces me to deal with the error in method2 and marks it
I know that Java enforce the programmer to list all exceptions that will be thrown by the method, and thus creating an easy way of listing all possible thrown exception for the user of code.
In .NET, method s开发者_开发技巧ignatures don\'t tell me if I have missed handling some exceptions that could be thrown by my code.
Why does it make sense to have Runtime Exceptions UnChecked (as opp开发者_开发问答osed to if they were Checked)?If you didn\'t you would have to have try/catch blocks every time you accessed an array
加载中,请稍侯......