In Thinking in C++ Volume 1, chapter 16: Introduction to Templates. The context: Notice that instead of just saying:
Is there any way around this: class B; class C { public: C() { } private: int i; friend B::B(); }; class B {
When defining a class as a friend class, does it matter in which accessor section the definitions is placed, and if so d开发者_JS百科oes that change the members the friend has access to?
assume that I have the following two template classes : template <class _A> class First { private:
I have a nested class in c++ which has to be public. But I need some of its methods visible to the outer world, and the rest visible only to the nesting class. That is:
I was wondering why Java has been designed without the frienddirective that is available in C++ to allow finer control over which methods and instance variables are a开发者_运维百科vailable from outsi
Given class A, which contains sets of raw data, and class B,开发者_JAVA百科 which contains a re-organized version (GUI ready) of that data I would like to make the raw data in A visible in B.
Since class friendship is not inherited in C++, what\'s the best way to \"fake\" it? I was thinking about expo开发者_Go百科sing the friend class\'s private interface through protected methods in the
加载中,请稍侯......