I have the following code for creation of a node inside a graph. I\'m getting resource leak error when I run a static checking tool (coverity). I would appreciate if you can point out how to improve t
As the title suggest, for example, in 85% of the situation, I\'d like to check the return code of foo(), but sometimes I really don\'t care about it, but this will raise Coverity warning.
In some header file which I can not modify I have the following set of defines: #define FLAG1(0x0000_0001)
I am using Coverity Prevent on a project to find errors. It reports an error for this expression (The variable names are of course change开发者_Python百科d):
I am using Coverity Prevent on a C++ project. Is there some way of flagging false positives dire开发者_StackOverflowctly in the source code?Coverity Static Analysis supports source code annotations.Th
I\'m in a situation where I\'m required to make at least s开发者_开发技巧ome effort to remove never-used code from my source code.The general preference is to use a static code analysis tool.We\'ve ha
加载中,请稍侯......