EasyMock allows you to create your own matchers so that you can specify what a mock should return for certain inputs. To do this, you create a custom implementation of their IArgumentMatcher interface
I\'m trying to test a method which calls a couple of other methods in the class. I\'d like the other methods to be stubbed out so they don\'t get executed. I had thought it was a simple matter of usin
(Disclaimer - EasyMock newb) According to the documentation (and this post), if I wanted to use EasyMock to generate stub objects, I should use EasyMock.createNiceMock(). A "nice mock" is ac
I\'m new to PowerMock and can\'t find an example that matches my situation. It\'s nothing complicated-- I am trying to use PowerMock+EasyMock to mock a final class in a TestNG test.
how this code test with easymock return (Long) getHibernateTemplate().execute( new HibernateCallback() {
Hello I would like to know what is the best approach to mock void methods for example: I have a PersonManager under the test and then I have dao that is mocked.
Is there anyway to make EasyMock to work with condit开发者_Python百科ionals? I have an if-else block in my method but the test only passes if I remove the conditional block. This might be a poblem wit
My code structure is l开发者_StackOverflowike below: class A { def a(x: () => Unit) { do something}
Object A { def a = { something} } // I\'ve import A, but still have er开发者_如何学编程ror message:not found: type A
I\'m having a strange problem with Easymock 3.0 and JUnit 4.8.2. The problem only occurs when executing the tests from Maven and not from Eclipse.
加载中,请稍侯......