The msdn documentation about order preservation in PLINQ states the following about ForAll(). Result when the s开发者_运维问答ource sequence is ordered: Executes nondeterministically in parallel
I\'m working on a web application framework, which uses MSSQL for data storage, mostly just does CRUD operations (but on arbitrarly complex structures), provides a WCF interface for rich Silverlight a
is it possible to run some of my PLINQ AsParallel() - Queries with a lower priority than others? (Or some with a higher priority than others)
Basically, I want to process a list of items in multiple threads instead of one at a time. I only want a limited number of threa开发者_运维问答ds going at a time.
I\'d like to ask you is it possible to use parallel programming in ASP.NET 4? For example PLINQ. (Because all hosting servers are multi-cores now and wi开发者_运维知识库ll it give better perfomance?)
Why PLINQ output is different than sequential processing and Parallel.For loop I want to add sum of square root of 10,000,000 numbers.. Here is the code for 3 cases:
I\'ve got a for loop I want to parallelize with something like PLINQ\'s Parallel.ForEach(). The key here is that the C++ library i\'m calling to do the computation is decidedly not thread safe, ther
let\'s say I have a big List List<long> longList = new Lis开发者_如何学Got<long>(10000000)
I have some per-thread components in my Windsor container. I\'m also using PLINQ. In the specific case of PLINQ operations, I actually 开发者_运维技巧want some of these components carried over to the
It is not possible to set an entire .net application to another culture other than the user profile-culture in .net. The appropriate way to control cultureinfo seems to be using the dedicated methods
加载中,请稍侯......