I have a generic method where I want to do something special for Strings. I\'ve found DirectCast(DirectCast(value, Object), String) to get the String value (when I\'ve already confirmed GetType(T) Is
I\'m slightly confused with template specialization. I have classes Vector2, Vector3 which have operator+= in it (which are defined the following way).
I have the following (minimized) code, which worked in VC2005, but no longer works in 2010. template <typename TDataType>
I am just starting to use UML and have came to the following question: Some actors clearly are specialized versions of a natural entity. For exam开发者_StackOverflowple I\'ve got Administrator and Us
I am trying to define a full specialization of std::basic_string< char, char_traits<char>, allocator<char> > which is typedef\'d (in g++) by the <string> header.
I\'m messing around with template specialization and I ran into a problem with trying to specialize the constructor based on what policy is used. Here is the code I am trying to get to work.
I\'m trying to model a specialization/generalization, leaning towards using class table inheritance (see this answer).
Since the function template in the following code is a member of a class template, it can\'t be specialized without specializing the enclosing class.
I am attempting to create a template \"AutoClass\" that create an arbitrary class with an arbitrary set of开发者_如何转开发 members, such as:
class A { }; template <typename A, int S> class B { public: static int a[S]; B() { a[0] = 0; } }; template<> int B<A, 1>::a[1];
加载中,请稍侯......