I\'ve read a lot of interesting things about type kinds, higher-kinded types and so on. By default Haskell supports two sorts of kind:
This paper establishes that type inference (called \"typability\" in the paper) in System F is undecidable. What I开发者_如何学Python\'ve never heard mentioned elsewhere is the second result of the pa
I remember a web page de开发者_如何学运维scribing interesting techniques in relation with some functional-programming task. The problem is that I can\'t remember what it was.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references,or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, a
http://muaddibspace.blogspot.com/2008/01/type-inference-for-simply-typed-lambda.html is a concise definition of the simply typed lambda calculus in Prolog.
Could you please explain me what is the basic connection开发者_开发问答 between the fundamentals of logical programming and the phenomenon of syntactic similarity between type systems and conventional
In Beyond Java(Section 2.2.9), Brute Tate claims that \"typing model\" is开发者_如何学编程 one of the problems of C++. What does that mean?What he means is that objects in C++ don\'t intrinsically hav
加载中,请稍侯......