I\'ve just learned about rebase, and I\'ve been strongly warned not to rebase commits after they have been pushed to a remote. I want to make sure I\'m not going to explode my repository
When I start a git rebase -i, I can issue commands like git rebase --continue, or git rebase --abort. Those commands only work if a rebase is in progress.
I managed to create a little mess in my local git repository. I was trying to fix a broken commit by using the following instructions. Before running the 开发者_如何转开发\"git commit --amend\" (and a
An开发者_高级运维other question says that git pull is like a git fetch + git merge. But what is the difference between git pull and git fetch + git rebase?It should be pretty obvious from your questio
How is it possible that when trying to squash/fixup a linear branch I still have to do manual merges? The repo has been converted from Subversion. Every conflict is either \"Automatic cherry-pick fail
I don\'t quite understand how the commits are squashed with git rebase -i. There is one thing I was left wondering:
edit The question boils down to \"Can git rebase be instructed to rebase tags, too?\" But an answer to the original question would also help.
Would it make sense to perform git rebase while preserving the commit timestamps? I believe a consequence would be that the new branch will not necessarily have commit dates chronologically. Is that
I have a Git repository with a branch that hardly ever changes (nobody else is contributing to it). It is basically the master branch with some code and files stripped out. Having this branch around m
Is it possible to rebase a branch with all its parent branches with Git? (I think "p开发者_C百科arent branches" is the correct form to use here. Depending on your viewpoint, you might also c
加载中,请稍侯......