Is it OK to use loop increment greater than 1? 开发者_高级运维#pragma omp parallel for schedule(dynamic, 1000)
I\'m using OpenMP to improve my program efficiency on loops. But r开发者_开发百科ecently I discovered that on small loops the use of this library decreased performances and that using the normal way
I have a code like the following which I am using to find prime numbers (using Eratosthenes sieve) within a range, and using OpenMP to parallelize. Before this,开发者_高级运维 I have a preprocessing s
I have a function compute() that has parallelized matrix multiplication inside of it using OpenMP #pragma omp parallel for
I\'m compiling an openmp project with the /MT switch (or equivalently in visual studio settings, \"C++: Code Generation: Runtime Library: Multi Threaded\".
I have in my program a loop that will fill an 3D cube with pixels (GL_POINTS), so to speed up things a little I thought i could use OpenMP and separate this for loop in my multi-core processor.
I have a loop that has been parallelized by OpenMP, but due to the nature of the task, there are 4 critical clauses.
The following piece code #pragma omp parallel printf(\"%f\", 1.0f); produces the a \"Floating point exception\". Has anyone encountered anything like that?
just playing around with openmp. Look at this code fragments: #pragma omp parallel { for( i =0;i<n;i++)
I have implemented few normal looping applications in OpenMP, TBB and OpenCL. In all these applications, OpeCL gives far better performance than others too when I am only running it on CPU with no spe
加载中,请稍侯......