Lets say I have something like the following: a.hpp: class B; class A { private: std::unique_ptr<B> b_;
I would like to better understand how to use static field an method in the presence of PIMPL idiom. Consider the following code.
In this question I unsuccessfully asked how to use different pimpl implementation depending on a template argument.
Consider next example : #include <iostream> #include <typeinfo> template< int N, typename T >
We are using the pimpl idiom in our classes. The pimpl struct is declared in the class which contains the pimpl pointer like so:
When using smart pointers with the pImpl idiom, as in struct Foo { private: struct Impl; boost::scoped_ptr<Impl> pImpl;
we want to use pimpl idiom for certain parts of our project. These parts of the project also happen to be parts where dynamic memory allocation is forbidden and this decision is not in our control.
After reading about the pimpl idiom I was horrified开发者_如何学C! Isn\'t there a tool out there that can inspect a .h/.cpp file and deduce what dependencies could be waivered?Sorry, but no there isn
This is a very noobish mistake, but I dont know whats happening here. There are loads of pimpl examples but I dont understand why this isn\'t working (this was one of the examples more or less but I
Consider the following: PImpl.hpp class Impl; class PImpl { Impl* pimpl; PImpl() : pimpl(new Impl) { } ~PImpl() { delete pimpl; }
加载中,请稍侯......