I currently 开发者_如何学JAVAhave a partial-application function which looks like this: Function.prototype.curry = function()
I know the conc开发者_运维问答ept and how to use of currying, but I wonder what is its value in practice?As the related question covers, Practical use of curried functions? , there are many reasons wh
I have this curry function: (define curry (lambda (f) (lambda (a) (lambda (b) (f a b))))) I think it\'s like (define curry (f 开发者_如何学Goa b)).
Shouldn’t this definition be allowed in a lazy language like Haskell in which functions are curried?
I have twice recently refactored code in order to change the order of parameters because there was too much code where hacks like flip or \\x -> foo bar x 42 were happening.
I need a js sum function to work l开发者_运维问答ike this: sum(1)(2) = 3 sum(1)(2)(3) = 6 sum(1)(2)(3)(4) = 10
One may implement a 开发者_JS百科limited form of Currying in Mathematica, using this construct: f[a_][b_][c_] := (a^2 + b^2)/c^2
I have a function with two parameter lists that I am trying to partially apply and use with currying. The second parameter list contains arguments that all have default values (but not implicit). Some
Suppose we have a nested generic class: public class A<T> { public class B<U> { } } Here, typeof(A<int>.B<>) is in essence a generic class with two parameters where only the
When I write something like map (1+) list in Haskell, what is the internal representation of (1+)? Since it is a partial application of (+), the argument 开发者_运维技巧1 has to be saved somewhere, bu
加载中,请稍侯......