I know this might be a stupid question to many but I usually like to stick to correct/better implementation. In Java, when writing a getter/setter, would it be better to refer to the instance variable
For database indexing purposes, the email field on a model needs to be stored in reverse.I end up needing access to both the reversed and forward version of the email field.I\'m curious as to which of
I have an interface like this: public interface ICoreType { int TypeID {get;} } And an NHibernate class that implements it like this:
I\'m trying to procedurally add getters/setters to objects in Javascript and although I think the code below should simply work, it doesn\'t act as I expected.
I can use @property and @synthesize in Objective-Cso i do not have to write getter and setter methods. In Ruby there is the attr_accessible doing the same in my opinion. Am i right or is there 开发者_
I understand that webservices are stateless. I want to know if there is any way we can expose the public properties (getters and setters) of a webservice on the client side (client side being a vb con
I know many similar questions have been asked, which is why I hesitated to post this at all, but I couldn\'t find anything that answered my question exactly:
I\'m relatively new to C++ and I think that my question may be underst开发者_开发百科ood best by example. In my header file, suppose I have
Background: I found this article on JavaWorld, where Allen Holub explains an alternative to Getters/Setters that maintains the principle that the implementation of an object should be hidden (his exa
Iam a little bit confused about the usability of setters and getters inside a Rails 3 application controller or helper.
加载中,请稍侯......