If I have a long list of objects that each has the possibility of returning null within a \"Linq where\" clause, e.g.
I am开发者_StackOverflow中文版 returning an anonymous class: var clients = from c in this.ClientRepository.SearchClientByTerm(term, 10)
When this code finishes, what is t开发者_如何学编程he result of myObject? object myObject = \"something\";
I think i remember seeing something similar to the ?: ternary operator in C# that only had two parts to it and would return the variable value if it wasn\'t null and a default value if it was.Somethin
Trying to figure out how to get the null coalescing operator to work in a foreach loop. I\'m checking to see what a string ends with and based on that, route it to a certain method. Basically what I
I need to add numerous variables of type nullable int. I used the null coalescing operator to get it down to one variable per line, but I have a feeling there is a more concise way to do this, e.g. ca
Recently I had a weird bug where I was concatenating a string wi开发者_StackOverflow社区th an int? and then adding another string after that.
null coalescing translates roughly to return x, unless it is null, in which case return y I often need return null if x is null, otherwise return x.y
I have a bunch of strings I need to use .Trim() on, but they can be null.It would be much more concise if I could do something like:
Below is some linqpad test code. When this runs it errors because the second instance of \"item\" has a null list of subitems as opposed to an empty list.
加载中,请稍侯......