I would like to make a macro that would essentially expand this: @WithB开发者_运维问答asicConstructor
Is it possible to add some magic construct around a Scala expression so that it prints the type during com开发者_如何学Pythonpilation? E.g. have some class, magic function, meta programming type, whic
I have a lot of code that calls static methods on Foo like \"Foo.method()\". I have two different implementations of Foo and would like to use one or the other depending on the circumstances. In psued
I need to use a string as the ID to obtain some object.At implement this in a run-time, and works well. But this makes the static type checking impossible, for obvious reasons.
Q: how to share information in nested classes about parent class class Post MODEL = self extend PostMod has_many :comments, :class_name => \'Post::Comment\'
Is there any software for drawing a Petri net and generating any source code from there? The source code could be in any already known programming language...
I really like the Ria Services approach, and I see Lightswitch as the next higher level of abstraction, but my scenario is this:
I don\'t get it, it seems to me that the call to f is completely unambiguous, but it fails to compile with expected primary-expression before ‘int’. If I comment out the line with the call to f, it
NAMES = [\'orange\', \'pear\'] Fruit.class_eval do NAMES.each do |n| define_method \"is_#{n}?\" do self.name == Fru开发者_StackOverflow中文版it.find_by_name(n)
If I add a meta method to a class, I would expect it to show up in Class.metaClass.metaMethods.But this seems not to be the case.In particular, if I do this:
加载中,请稍侯......