I was kidding with metaprogramming in Ruby and I did this code: class Class def ===(other) other.kind_of?(self)
I\'m wondering, if there is a way to check at compile time whether a type T of some iterator type is a const_iterator, or not. Is there some difference in 开发者_如何转开发the types that iterators def
In this question I unsuccessfully asked how to use different pimpl implementation depending on a template argument.
Consider next example : #include <iostream> #include <typeinfo> template< int N, typename T >
I want to find a good way to generate test vectors automatically.By way of example, I am testing an audio processing module by calling a function that exercises the module-under-test with the specifie
i have the following: class ThirdParty < ActiveRecord::Base # Dynamically adds accessors of the requested kind.
As a result of some helpful answers to a question I posted yesterday about tuples in Scala, I\'ve been looking at Scala HLists. I\'d like to re-hash a C++ example from that question 开发者_如何学运维t
As question states, is there a reason why people use the struct version over the normal conditionals开发者_JS百科?An excerpt from the Boost Coding Guidelines for Integral Constant Expressions:
I\'m new to ruby metaprogramming, and I see people metaprogramming code in different places, like class Object, class Module, module Kernel and \"nothing\" (ie, out of a class/module definition block)
How can I lazy evaluate second arg in std::conditional? #include \"stdafx.h\" #include <type_traits>
加载中,请稍侯......