Very short question: Is there a more elegant way to do this: Object tmp; try { tmp = somethingThatCanFail();
In java Program, parameters which is defined as String in method declaration. But in method definition it is accessed as final String variable. Whether it\'ll lead to some issues (like security, memor
is final Map<Integer,Map<String,Integer>> status = new ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, Map<String,Integer>>();
Is it possible to have final transient fields that are set to any non-default value after serialization in Java?My usecase is a cache variable — that\'s why it is transient.I also have a habit of mak
I have an class defining an immutable value type that I now need to serialize. The immutability comes from the final fields which are set in the constructor. I\'ve tried serializing, and it works (sur
The Java language spec defines semantics of final fields in section 17.5: The usage model for final fields is a simple one. Set the final fields for an object in that object\'s constructor. Do not w
I\'m declaring a field: private static final String filename = \"filename.txt\"; First, does the order of private static final matter? If not, is there a standard accepted sequence or convention?
I would like to write the following code: boolean found = false; search(new SearchCallback() { @Override void onFound(Object o) { found = true; }
In ArrayBlockingQueue, all the methods that require the lock copy it to a local final variable before calling lock().
I keep running into slight variations of a problem in Java and it\'s starting to get to me, and I can\'t really think of a proper way to get around it.
加载中,请稍侯......