I was studying this to understand the behavior of final fields in the new JMM (5 onwards). This concept is clear:guaranteed visibility of initialized final fields to all threads after the object is pr
Why do I get this message when I\'m writing a handler and the compiler insist on making the variable as final?
Huzzah! This code worked for a time, then I decided to add a default color, and it stopped working.I get the following error:
I have the following code: <a4j:commandButton value=\"Adicionar BOM\" onclick=\"#{rich:component(\'addBomModal\')}.show()\">
Eclipse is offering final but I can\'t increase the i variable. @Override public void onClick(View v) {
This question is a continuation of this one but asking for a more specific scenario. Lets say we have the following class:
I have a graph (g) that uses a builder ( J Bloch style ).The graph needs to be reversed to run certain statistics that are then cached for reports and analysis algorithms to access.
Is the any difference in performance and/or any other benefits we can get when using final keyword with constant utility class. [ This class contains only static final fields and private constructor t
I am following the well famous IBM tutorial on parsing an RSS feed. I tested it and I am getting a list of the first item only. In the AndroidSaxFeedParser, we can see that currentMessage is final whi
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clari
加载中,请稍侯......