By now, most mainstream browsers have started integrating optimizing JIT compilers to their JavaScript interpreters/virtual machines. That\'s good for everyone. Now, I\'d be hard-pressed to know exact
The following code gives different output when running the release inside Visual Studio, and running the release outside Visual Studio. I\'m using Visual Studio 2008 and targeting .NET 3.5. I\'ve also
I\'ve read that there is a jit compiler module for dalvik vm on the works and the results are quite promising. Some people claim an improvement of 100% in terms of execution speed. Does anyone have an
The canonical JVM implementation from Sun applies some pretty sophisticated optimization to bytecode to obtain near-native execution speeds after the code has been run a few times.
In a comment on this answer (which suggests using bit-shift operators over integer multiplication / division, for performance), I queried whether this would actually be faster. In the back of my mind
I have the following .NET value types: [StructLayo开发者_JS百科ut(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct Date
I have heard that Java must use a JIT to be fast. This makes perfect sense when comparing to interpretation, but why can\'t someone make an ahead-of-time compiler that generates fast Java code? I know
Is it possible to manipulate the bytecode of a 开发者_如何学编程(signed) .NET program at runtime? E.g. by forcing the JIT to re-evalutate the IL?Yes, it\'s possible with the .net CLR profiling APIs. B
We s开发者_开发知识库eem to be subject to a strange bug in our Java environment. We\'ve now had two occurrences of the same \"can\'t happen\" exception; in one case the problem occurred 42,551 times o
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
加载中,请稍侯......