I have a set of custom ASP.NET server controls, most of which derive from CompositeControl.I want to implement a uniform look for \"required\" fields across all control types by wrapping each control
Anyone know of a project(s) that seek to abstract form definitions on level higher than WPF, Silverlight, Winforms, WebForms, etc...
In an object-oriented program: How much abstraction is too much? How much is just right? I have always been a nuts and bolts kind of guy. I understood the concept behind high levels of encapsulation
I somehow have the feeling that modern systems, including runtime libraries, this exception handler and that built-in debugger build up more and more layers between my (C++) programs and the CPU/rest
I\'d like to develop a numb开发者_运维百科er of non-trivial Rails applications which all implement a core set of functionality but each have certain particular customizations, extensions, and aestheti
My point is, if you don\'t understand the abstraction of a framework,开发者_如何学编程 you can still decompile it and understand it, because you know the language e.g. Java. However, when byte-code ge
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this
In an n-tier architecture, the best place to put an object-relational mapping (OR/M) code is in the data access layer.For example, database queries and updates can be delegated to 开发者_开发技巧a too
I rece开发者_StackOverflowntly ran across several objects implemented to handle events with a hard coded mapping using this pattern:
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. 开发者_开发知识库
加载中,请稍侯......