I want to use 开发者_StackOverflowassembly code in CUDA C code in order to reduce expensive executions
Due to MSVC10 not allowing the use of inline ASM instructions when targeting x64 architecture, I\'m looking for any ways to get around such restrictions. I have learned from googling that writing and
I get a different return value each time, so I\'m doing something wrong. If I replace the add with a basic inc, it returns correctly.
I am writing small kernel for the 8086 processor (Working in BC3.1, on Windows XP as host operating system). Kernel is multithreaded, so I have problems when I use printf or cout for debugging (somewh
As far as I can tell, the only difference between __asm { ... }; and __asm__(\"...\"); is that the first uses mov eax, var and t开发者_如何学Pythonhe second uses movl %0, %%eax with :\"=r\" (var) at t
When re开发者_如何学JAVAading the linux 0.01 kernel I pass throw some inline gas which is hard for me to decode:
how can i write a string (eg. \"Hello\") to stdout from the stack? without, data-segments, that is. void main() {
I don\'t understand why this code #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main(){ int result=0;
This is not homework, just something I though of. So, straight computing factorial is not exactly fast; memoization can help, but if the result is to fit into 32 or 64 bits, then the factorial only ca
Related to my other question, please help me debug \"An unhandled exception of type \'System.AccessViolationException\' occurred in Unknown Module.Additional information: Attempted to read or write pr
加载中,请稍侯......