I have written a C program that consists of a number of files, and uses APR (http://apr.apache.org) - it includes its headers and I would prefer dynamic linking of its libraries.
I currently have a c++ setup like the following class FlowController { public: //... private: cntrl::OneWayValve _intake;
In my application I have 3 major parts: Exe : an executable file Lib_A : a library contains a singleton class and a base class for some calculations to be use in singleton
I have the following C++ code to make dll (Visual Studio 2010). class Shape { public: Shape() { nshapes++;
Since the dynamically linked libraries have to be resolved at run-time, are statically linked executables faster than dynamically li开发者_StackOverflow中文版nked executables?Static linking produces a
I\'ve got multiple version of the same library to which my program dynamically links. Sometimes I\'d like to change the version that gets used.
I am getting following runtime error. anyfile.c开发者_Python百科pp (60) : E_FATAL : Could not start process libprocbase_so.so
I\'m trying to compile boost and mongodb. I want 64bit versions, shared libs and dynamic linking to the runtime.
i have to create a dynamically linked library in zOS . What are the options to be passed to the compiler.
I\'m building some packages with autoconf and automake, and would like to make sure libraries are dynamically linked (i.e. no stat开发者_如何学Cic links).
加载中,请稍侯......