I\'ve been fiddling around a bit with the prototype and closure patterns in Javascript. As you might know, there\'s a performance penalty when using the closure pattern because it redefines the same f
In JavaScript, why would one want to attach properties directly to the constructor? var Human = function() {};
Bounty Edit: I\'m looking for code written in a pure prototypical OO paradigm (think Self). Not a mixture of prototypical OO and classical OO. I don\'t want to see generic OO wrappers but simply usag
I\'m trying to create a function that creates an object with a prototype chain, like this: something = object(proto1, proto2, proto3);
Why is myPerson.age undefined? function Person() { var age = 28; } var myPerson = new Person(); console.log(myPerson.age);
I\'m trying to get a deeper hold on prototypal inheritance and class creation (I know, there are other ways, but for the purpose of this I\'m trying to grasp prototypes.) My question is: Using the fol
I understand javascript prototype inheritance through the __proto__ property. However I notice that when I do var f = function() {} f will now have a prototype开发者_如何学编程 property in addition to
Everyone seems to generally agree that prototype inheritance is simpler and more flexible than class inheritance. What I have not seen in the literature that I\'ve read is very many examples of things
Object.create = function (o) { function F() {} F.prototype = o; return new F(); }; From Prototypal Inheritance in JavaScript
EDIT: Fixed my example开发者_运维技巧 to demonstrate the behavior. I wanted the details property of AbstractParent to be what I would call an \"instance property\" but it\'s acting more like a \"stat
加载中,请稍侯......