It is not required by the language specification开发者_运维知识库 and seems to be vendor-specific.
Why does C# allow code blocks with开发者_运维百科out a preceding statement (e.g. if, else, for, while)?
I wonder from a language design perspective why Scala has removed Java\'s class literal (e. g. String.class) and replaced it with classOf[String], but has then added a \"type literal\" with its Single
The Scala Language Specification says under §3.2.1: A stable type is either a singleton type or a type which is declared to be
Consider something like this: object Singleton val cls: Class[Singleton] = ??? What do I have to write instead of ????
Consider this example: import java.util.*; class Foo<T> { public int baz(List<String> stringlist) { return 1; }
Is it safe by default, like Java\'s 开发者_JAVA技巧single-element-enum pattern or is it e. g. necessary to define readResolve or similar methods somewhere to prevent accidental or malicious breakage o
I have written a variant class, which will be used as the main type in a dynamic language, that will ultimately allow 256 different types of value (header is an unsigned byte, only 20 are actually use
In ruby, when one defines a method in the root scope, it can be called from that scope: def foo \"foo\"
I am using shared_ptr as my garbage collection for a toy language that I am working on which compiles to C++. My objects derive from a common base class above that there are strings and numbers then t
加载中,请稍侯......