My application is a asp.net 3.5 running on iis 6 (windows 2003) This application is serving 1000\'s of users daily (100-500 users online).
We have a batch process consisting of about 5 calculations that happens on each row of data (20 million rows total).Our production server will have around 24 processors with decent CPUs.
I\'m looking at implementing a \"Heartbeat\" process to do a lot of repeated cleanup tasks throughout the day.
Currently I\'m in the process of designing the messaging system for my application (which uses AMQP on the backend via RabbitMQ). There are going to be multiple instances where a method can get data f
I want to manage a list of Futures objects returned by my TaskExecutor. I\'ve something like this List<Future<String>> list
I set the max thread to 10. Then I added 22000 task using ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem. It is very likely that not all the 22000 task was completed after running the program. Is there a limitation how
I use QueueUserWorkItem() function to invoke threadpool. And I tried lots of work with it. (about 30000)
I have generated dumps on four servers and am analyzing the output of !threadpo开发者_运维技巧ol and !threads. I noticed the roughly consistent following output:
W开发者_运维知识库hat I need is actually a thread-safe queue structure, where multiple clients keep dumping data into the queue and one working thread keeps processing and popping the queue
Ok, I know an object of System.Timer executed in the thread-pool, rather than in the UI thread. I also know that the System.Timer is thread-safe.
加载中,请稍侯......